Evaluating the Profitability of Perpetual Dexes in the DeFi Ecosystem

May 15, 2023

Evaluating the Profitability of Perpetual Dexes in the DeFi Ecosystem

May 15, 2023

Evaluating the Profitability of Perpetual Dexes in the DeFi Ecosystem



Introduction:


In the evolving realm of decentralized finance (DeFi), perpetual decentralized exchanges (Dexes) have established themselves as substantial revenue generators. Prithvir, the Co-Founder and CEO of Loch Chain, recently highlighted the impressive fee generation of some of the predominant Dexes, examining the sustainability and profitability of $GMX, $DYDX, $GNS, and $LVL. This article dives deep into the underlying dynamics of these Dexes, analyzing their revenue, token incentives, and overall earnings to elucidate their long-term viability.


Robust Fee Generation Amidst a Bear Market:


Perpetual Dexes are revered for their ability to generate high fees within the DeFi sector. For instance, $GMX managed to generate approximately $260k in fees in a single day, translating to an annual fee generation of around $95m, even amidst a bear market. It’s imperative to understand, however, which of these Dexes are genuinely profitable for token holders. This article will explore how $DYDX, $GNS, and $LVL compare in terms of sustainability and profitability.


Comparative Analysis: Revenue Generation:


To understand the real profitability and sustainability of these Dexes, it's crucial to consider their cumulative revenue over a specific period. In the last six months:


  • $DYDX accumulated $44m in revenue.

  • $GMX followed with $26m.

  • $LVL reported $10m.

  • $GNS finished with $8.6m.


In terms of revenue, $DYDX emerges as the clear winner, marking a significant lead over the others.


Token Incentives and their Impact:


Token incentives play a pivotal role in determining the overall earnings of a Dex. Over the past six months:


  • $DYDX paid out $47m in token incentives.

  • $LVL allocated $29m.

  • $GMX designated $12m.

  • $GNS did not allocate any token incentives, maintaining sustainability.


It appears that the high revenue generated by $DYDX and $LVL is offset by their high token incentives, making $GMX and $GNS seem more sustainable due to their lower incentive allocations.


Evaluating Earnings:


To assess the true profitability of these Dexes, evaluating earnings (Revenue - Token Incentives) is essential. In this regard:


  • $GMX reported $15m in earnings.

  • $GNS followed with $8.5m.

  • $DYDX incurred a loss of $-3.3m.

  • $LVL suffered a deficit of $-19.2m.


Interestingly, $GMX and $GNS are the only two reporting positive earnings, which is a rare feat in the crypto domain, showcasing their potential sustainability. Despite impressive revenues, $DYDX and $LVL are grappling with losses due to their substantial spending on incentives.


Strategic Movements and Market Positioning:


$GMX and $GNS have successfully bootstrapped substantial growth with relatively minimal incentives paid out. In contrast, $DYDX's substantial incentives seem to overshadow its revenue generation. However, its impending transition to a Cosmos app-chain is anticipated to bring better value accrual to the token.


$LVL operates on Binance Smart Chain (BSC), which means it faces less competition compared to the others on Ethereum or Arbitrum. If $LVL can bootstrap sufficient sticky users with lower token incentives, it could potentially become a formidable contender against the other three protocols.


Conclusion:


The analysis of perpetual Dexes like $DYDX, $GMX, $GNS, and $LVL sheds light on the nuances of revenue generation, token incentives, and overall earnings within the DeFi space. While $GMX and $GNS have exhibited commendable sustainability with positive earnings and minimal incentives, $DYDX and $LVL need to reassess their strategy concerning token incentives.


$LVL, operating on BSC, possesses the unique advantage of less competition and, with strategic moves, could become a serious contender in the space.


This comparative analysis is vital for potential investors and stakeholders to understand the underlying dynamics of perpetual Dexes in the DeFi ecosystem and make informed decisions regarding their investments and alignments.


To keep abreast of more insights and analyses like this, stay connected with Prithvir and keep a watch on the evolving trends and paradigms within the crypto world.


The data for this analysis is credited to @tokenterminal. For more intricate details and ongoing discussions, feel free to explore and participate in the knowledge-sharing within the expansive and dynamic crypto community.

Evaluating the Profitability of Perpetual Dexes in the DeFi Ecosystem



Introduction:


In the evolving realm of decentralized finance (DeFi), perpetual decentralized exchanges (Dexes) have established themselves as substantial revenue generators. Prithvir, the Co-Founder and CEO of Loch Chain, recently highlighted the impressive fee generation of some of the predominant Dexes, examining the sustainability and profitability of $GMX, $DYDX, $GNS, and $LVL. This article dives deep into the underlying dynamics of these Dexes, analyzing their revenue, token incentives, and overall earnings to elucidate their long-term viability.


Robust Fee Generation Amidst a Bear Market:


Perpetual Dexes are revered for their ability to generate high fees within the DeFi sector. For instance, $GMX managed to generate approximately $260k in fees in a single day, translating to an annual fee generation of around $95m, even amidst a bear market. It’s imperative to understand, however, which of these Dexes are genuinely profitable for token holders. This article will explore how $DYDX, $GNS, and $LVL compare in terms of sustainability and profitability.


Comparative Analysis: Revenue Generation:


To understand the real profitability and sustainability of these Dexes, it's crucial to consider their cumulative revenue over a specific period. In the last six months:


  • $DYDX accumulated $44m in revenue.

  • $GMX followed with $26m.

  • $LVL reported $10m.

  • $GNS finished with $8.6m.


In terms of revenue, $DYDX emerges as the clear winner, marking a significant lead over the others.


Token Incentives and their Impact:


Token incentives play a pivotal role in determining the overall earnings of a Dex. Over the past six months:


  • $DYDX paid out $47m in token incentives.

  • $LVL allocated $29m.

  • $GMX designated $12m.

  • $GNS did not allocate any token incentives, maintaining sustainability.


It appears that the high revenue generated by $DYDX and $LVL is offset by their high token incentives, making $GMX and $GNS seem more sustainable due to their lower incentive allocations.


Evaluating Earnings:


To assess the true profitability of these Dexes, evaluating earnings (Revenue - Token Incentives) is essential. In this regard:


  • $GMX reported $15m in earnings.

  • $GNS followed with $8.5m.

  • $DYDX incurred a loss of $-3.3m.

  • $LVL suffered a deficit of $-19.2m.


Interestingly, $GMX and $GNS are the only two reporting positive earnings, which is a rare feat in the crypto domain, showcasing their potential sustainability. Despite impressive revenues, $DYDX and $LVL are grappling with losses due to their substantial spending on incentives.


Strategic Movements and Market Positioning:


$GMX and $GNS have successfully bootstrapped substantial growth with relatively minimal incentives paid out. In contrast, $DYDX's substantial incentives seem to overshadow its revenue generation. However, its impending transition to a Cosmos app-chain is anticipated to bring better value accrual to the token.


$LVL operates on Binance Smart Chain (BSC), which means it faces less competition compared to the others on Ethereum or Arbitrum. If $LVL can bootstrap sufficient sticky users with lower token incentives, it could potentially become a formidable contender against the other three protocols.


Conclusion:


The analysis of perpetual Dexes like $DYDX, $GMX, $GNS, and $LVL sheds light on the nuances of revenue generation, token incentives, and overall earnings within the DeFi space. While $GMX and $GNS have exhibited commendable sustainability with positive earnings and minimal incentives, $DYDX and $LVL need to reassess their strategy concerning token incentives.


$LVL, operating on BSC, possesses the unique advantage of less competition and, with strategic moves, could become a serious contender in the space.


This comparative analysis is vital for potential investors and stakeholders to understand the underlying dynamics of perpetual Dexes in the DeFi ecosystem and make informed decisions regarding their investments and alignments.


To keep abreast of more insights and analyses like this, stay connected with Prithvir and keep a watch on the evolving trends and paradigms within the crypto world.


The data for this analysis is credited to @tokenterminal. For more intricate details and ongoing discussions, feel free to explore and participate in the knowledge-sharing within the expansive and dynamic crypto community.

Other blog posts

Loch, Inc. © 2023

2261 Market Street,

San Francisco, CA 94114

The content made available on this web page and our mobile applications ("Platform") is for informational purposes only. You should not construe any such information or other material as financial advice in any way. All information provided on the Platform is provided on an as is and available basis, based on the data provided by the end user on the Platform. Nothing contained on our Platform constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or offer by us or any third-party service provider to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments in this or in any other jurisdiction in which such solicitation or offer would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. All content on this Platform is information of a general nature and does not address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Nothing in the Platform constitutes financial advice, nor does any information on the Platform constitute a comprehensive or complete statement of the matters discussed or the law relating thereto. You alone assume the sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information or other content on the platform before making any decisions based on such information. In exchange for using the Platform, you agree not to hold us, our affiliates, or any third-party service provider liable for any possible claim for damages arising from any decision you make based on information or other content made available to you through the Platform.

Loch, Inc. © 2024

The content made available on this web page and our mobile applications ("Platform") is for informational purposes only. You should not construe any such information or other material as financial advice in any way. All information provided on the Platform is provided on an as is and available basis, based on the data provided by the end user on the Platform. Nothing contained on our Platform constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or offer by us or any third-party service provider to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments in this or in any other jurisdiction in which such solicitation or offer would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. All content on this Platform is information of a general nature and does not address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Nothing in the Platform constitutes financial advice, nor does any information on the Platform constitute a comprehensive or complete statement of the matters discussed or the law relating thereto. You alone assume the sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information or other content on the platform before making any decisions based on such information. In exchange for using the Platform, you agree not to hold us, our affiliates, or any third-party service provider liable for any possible claim for damages arising from any decision you make based on information or other content made available to you through the Platform.

2261 Market Street,

San Francisco, CA 94114

Loch, Inc. © 2024

The content made available on this web page and our mobile applications ("Platform") is for informational purposes only. You should not construe any such information or other material as financial advice in any way. All information provided on the Platform is provided on an as is and available basis, based on the data provided by the end user on the Platform. Nothing contained on our Platform constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or offer by us or any third-party service provider to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments in this or in any other jurisdiction in which such solicitation or offer would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. All content on this Platform is information of a general nature and does not address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Nothing in the Platform constitutes financial advice, nor does any information on the Platform constitute a comprehensive or complete statement of the matters discussed or the law relating thereto. You alone assume the sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information or other content on the platform before making any decisions based on such information. In exchange for using the Platform, you agree not to hold us, our affiliates, or any third-party service provider liable for any possible claim for damages arising from any decision you make based on information or other content made available to you through the Platform.

2261 Market Street,

San Francisco, CA 94114